Method for preparing supported catalysts from metal loaded carbon nanotubes

ABSTRACT

A new method for preparing a supported catalyst is herein provided. Carbon nanotubes are functionalized by contacting them with an oxidizing agent to form functionalized carbon nanotubes. A metal catalyst is then loaded or deposited onto the functionalized carbon nanotubes. The mixture is then extruded to form the supported catalyst comprising a carbon nanotube structure containing metal catalyst more evenly dispersed within the internal structure of the carbon nanotube structure.

CROSS REFERENCE INFORMATION

This application claims benefit to and priority of U.S. ProvisionalApplication No. 60/628,469, filed Nov. 16, 2004, which is herebyincorporated by reference in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to a new method for preparing supported catalystby predeposition of the catalyst or catalyst precursor onto the carbonnanotube followed by formation of a carbon nanotube structure with thepredeposited or metal loaded carbon nanotube. The result is a supportedcatalyst comprising a carbon nanotube structure with metal catalystsmore evenly and thoroughly dispersed in the structure. As such, thesupported catalyst of the present invention contains a higherconcentration and better distribution of metal catalysts, leading tomore efficient and higher yields of the desired final product.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Supported Catalysts

Supported catalysts (i.e., catalysts which are supported on some sort ofsurface, structure, or support, etc.) typically comprise an inertsupport material and a catalytically active material. Becauseheterogeneous reactions are normally carried out at elevatedtemperatures (and sometimes at elevated pressures as well) and in areactive atmosphere, the exact chemical nature of the active catalystcomponent within the reaction zone can be difficult to determine. Thus,the terms “catalyst” or “supported catalyst” are often usedinterchangeably in the industry to refer to the composition comprisingboth the inert support and catalytically active material that is chargedinto the reaction zone, although it is acknowledged that the exactnature of the active material within the reaction zone is usually notdeterminable.

Supported catalysts may be prepared by, for example, initiallydepositing precursors of the actual catalytically active material ontothe inert support and then treating them accordingly (e.g.,calcination), before feeding them into the reaction zone. More extensivepre-treatments and passivation steps to stabilize the supported catalystbefore feeding to the reaction zone are also common. In a commonexample, metal salts are deposited onto inert support, converted intometal oxides by calcinations at elevated temperatures and then furtherreduced in situ to active pure metal catalysts.

Supported catalysts are widely used in heterogeneous catalytic reactionsfor chemical processes in the petroleum, petrochemical and chemicalindustries. Such reactions are commonly performed with the reactant(s)and product(s) in the fluid phase and the catalyst in the solid phase.In heterogeneous catalytic reactions, the reaction occurs at theinterface between the phases, i.e., the interface between the fluidphase of the reactant(s) and product(s) and the solid phase of thesupported catalyst. Hence, the properties of the surface of aheterogeneous supported catalyst are important factors in the effectiveuse of the catalyst.

For example, the surface area of the active catalyst, as supported, andthe accessibility of that surface area to reactant adsorption andproduct desorption are important. These factors affect the activity ofthe catalyst, i.e., the rate of conversion of reactants to products.

Generally, catalytic activity is proportional to catalyst surface area.Therefore, a high specific area is desirable. However, the surface areashould be accessible to reactants and products as well as to heat flow.

The active catalyst material may be supported on the external and/orinternal structure of a support. Often, the internal structure of asupport can contain a greater surface area than the external surface,because of the internal porosity. The chemisorption of a reactant by acatalyst surface is preceded by the diffusion of that reactant throughthe internal structure of the support.

Therefore, when an ample amount of active catalysts are located orsupported in the internal structure of a support, the accessibility ofthe internal structure of the support to reactant(s), product(s) andheat flow is important. Accessibility is measured by porosity and poresize distribution. Activated carbons and charcoals used as catalystsupports may have surface areas of about a thousand square meters pergram, and porosities of greater than 1 ml/gm. However, much of thissurface area and porosity (e.g., as much as 50%, and often more), isoften associated with micropores (i.e., pores with pore diameters of 2nm or less). These pores can be inaccessible because of diffusionlimitations. They are easily plugged and thereby deactivated. Thus, highporosity materials where the pores are mainly in the mesopore region(i.e., 2-50 nm) or macropore region (i.e., greater than 50 nm) are mostdesirable.

It is also important that supported catalysts not fracture or attritduring use because such fragments may become entrained in the reactionstream and must then be separated from the reaction mixture. The cost ofreplacing attritted catalyst, the cost of separating it from thereaction mixture and the risk of contaminating the product are allburdens upon the process. In slurry phase, e.g., where the solidsupported catalyst is filtered from the process stream and recycled tothe reaction zone, the attritted fines may plug the filters and disruptthe process.

The chemical purity of the catalyst and the catalyst support also haveimportant effects on the selectivity of the catalyst, i.e., the degreeto which the catalyst produces one product from among several products,and the life of the catalyst. Thus, it is also important that acatalyst, at the very least, minimize its contribution to the chemicalcontamination of reactant(s) and product(s). In the case of a catalystsupport, this is even more important since the support is a potentialsource of contamination both to the catalyst it supports and to thechemical process. Further, some catalysts are particularly sensitive tocontamination that can either promote unwanted competing reactions,i.e., affect its selectivity, or render the catalyst ineffective, i.e.,“poison” it. For example, charcoal and commercial graphites or carbonsmade from petroleum residues usually contain trace amounts of sulfur ornitrogen. Carbons of natural resources may contain these materials aswell as metals common to biological systems and may be undesirable forthat reason.

Another important factor which can affect the efficiency of a supportedcatalyst is the amount of active catalysts in or on the support, as wellas the distribution of the active catalysts throughout or within thesupport itself. Supported catalyst which contain more active catalystsin or on the support will generally have better results and catalyticactivity than supported catalyst mainly comprised of the supportmaterial with few active catalysts. Furthermore, supported catalystswhich have catalytic materials more evenly dispersed throughout orwithin the support generally have higher yield and catalytic activitythan supported catalysts which have poor distribution of the catalyticmaterial in or on the support.

Carbon Nanotubes

Carbon nanotubes have been identified as materials of interest for useas catalysts and catalyst supports. Carbon nanotubes exist in a varietyof forms and have been prepared through the catalytic decomposition ofvarious carbon-containing gases at metal surfaces.

Carbon nanotubes (also known as fibrils) are vermicular carbon depositshaving diameters less than 1.0, preferably less than 0.5μ, and even morepreferably less than 0.2μ. Carbon nanotubes can be either multi walled(i.e., have more than one graphene layer more or less parallel thenanotube axis) or single walled (i.e., have only a single graphene layerparallel to the nanotube axis). Other types of carbon nanotubes are alsoknown, such as fishbone fibrils (e.g., wherein the grapheme layersexhibit a herringbone pattern with respect to the tube axis), etc. Asproduced, carbon nanotubes may be in the form of discrete nanotubes,aggregates of nanotubes (i.e., dense, microscopic particulate structurecomprising entangled carbon nanotubes) or a mixture of both.

Processes for forming carbon nanotubes are well known. E.g., Baker andHarris, Chemistry and Physics of Carbon, Walker and Thrower ed., Vol.14, 1978, p. 83; Rodriguez, N., Journal of Materials Research, Vol. 8,p. 3233 (1993); Oberlin, A. and Endo, M., Journal of Crystal Growth,Vol. 32 (1976), pp. 335-349; U.S. Pat. No. 4,663,230 to Tennent; U.S.Pat. No. 5,171,560 to Tennent; Iijima, Nature vol. 354, 56, 1991;Weaver, Science 265, 1994; de Heer, Walt A., “Nanotubes and the Pursuitof Applications,” MRS Bulletin, April, 2004; etc; “Single-shell carbonnanotubes of 1-nm diameter”, S Iijima and T Ichihashi Nature, vol. 363,p. 603 (1993); “Cobalt-catalysed growth of carbon nanotubes withsingle-atomic-layer walls,” D S Bethune, C H Kiang, M S DeVries, GGorman, R Savoy and R Beyers Nature, vol. 363, p. 605 (1993); U.S. Pat.No. 5,424,054 to Bethune et al.; Guo, T., Nikoleev, P., Thess, A.,Colbert, D. T., and Smally, R. E., Chemical Physics Letters 243: 1-12(1995); Thess, A., Lee, R., Nikolaev, P., Dai, H., Petit, P., Robert,J., Xu, C., Lee, Y. H., Kim, S. G., Rinzler, A. G., Colbert, D. T.,Scuseria, G. E., Tonarek, D., Fischer, J. E., and Smalley, R. E.,Science, 273: 483-487 (1996); Dai., H., Rinzler, A. G., Nikolaev, P.,Thess, A., Colbert, D. T., and Smalley, R. E., Chemical Physics Letters260: 471-475 (1996); U.S. Pat. No. 6,761,870 (also WO 00/26138) toSmalley, et. al; “Controlled production of single-wall carbon nanotubesby catalytic decomposition of CO on bimetallic Co-Mo catalysts,”Chemical Physics Letters, 317 (2000) 497-503; U.S. Pat. No. 6,333,016 toResasco, et al., etc. All of these references are hereby incorporated byreference.

The most preferred way of making carbon nanotubes is by catalytic growthfrom hydrocarbons or other gaseous carbon compounds, such as CO,mediated by supported or free floating catalyst particles.

Carbon nanotubes may also be formed as aggregates, which are densemicroscope particulate structures of entangled carbon nanotubes and mayresemble the morphology of bird nest, cotton candy, combed yarn or opennet. Aggregates are formed during the production of carbon nanotubes andthe morphology of the aggregate is controlled by the choice of catalystsupport. Spherical supports grow nanotubes in all directions leading tothe formation of bird nest aggregates. Combed yarn and open netaggregates are prepared using supports having one or more readilycleavable planar surfaces, e.g., an iron or iron-containing metalcatalyst particle deposited on a support material having one or morereadily cleavable surfaces and a surface area of at least 1 square meterper gram. Further details regarding the formation of carbon nanotubeaggregates may be found in the disclosure of U.S. Pat. No. 6,143,689 toMoy; U.S. Pat. No. 5,165,909 to Tennent et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,456,897to Moy et al.; Snyder et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,707,916, filed May 1,1991, and PCT Application No. US89/00322, filed Jan. 28, 1989 (“CarbonFibrils”) WO 89/07163, and Moy et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,456,897 filedAug. 2, 1994 and PCT Application No. US90/05498, filed Sep. 27, 1990(“Battery”) WO 91/05089, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,500,200 to Mandeville etal., filed Jun. 7, 1995 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,456,897 filed Aug. 2, 1994and U.S. Pat. No. 5,569,635 filed Oct. 11, 1994 by Moy et al., all ofwhich are assigned to the same assignee as the invention here and arehereby incorporated by reference.

Carbon nanotubes are distinguishable from commercially availablecontinuous carbon fibers. For instance, carbon fibers have aspect ratios(L/D) of at least 10⁴ and often 10⁶ or more, while carbon nanotubes havedesirably large, but unavoidably finite, aspect ratios (e.g., less thanor greater than 100). Furthermore, the diameter of continuous carbonfibers, which is always greater than 1.0μ and typically 5 to 7μ, is alsofar larger than that of carbon nanotubes, which is usually less than1.0μ. Carbon nanotubes also have vastly superior strength andconductivity than carbon fibers.

Carbon nanotubes also differ physically and chemically from other formsof carbon such as standard graphite and carbon black. Standard graphite,because of its structure, can undergo oxidation to almost completesaturation. Moreover, carbon black is an amorphous carbon generally inthe form of spheroidal particles having a graphene structure, such ascarbon layers around a disordered nucleus. On the other hand, carbonnanotubes have one or more layers of ordered graphitic carbon atomsdisposed substantially concentrically about the cylindrical axis of thenanotube. These differences, among others, make graphite and carbonblack poor predictors of carbon nanotube chemistry.

Carbon Nanotube Structures

In addition to carbon nanotubes, carbon nanotube structures are known tobe useful catalyst supports and catalysts. Carbon nanotube structuresprovide certain structural advantages over other known carbon catalystsupports in that more of the internal pore structures are in the form ofmesopores (i.e., 2 to 50 nm) and macropores (i.e., greater than 50 nm).Furthermore, carbon nanotube structures also have greater structuralstrength, and thus are less likely to frit or attrit in comparison toother known carbon catalyst supports.

Carbon nanotube structures include, but are not limited to, assemblagesand rigid porous structures.

a. Assemblages are carbon nanotube structures which have relativelyuniform properties along one, preferably two and most desirably threedimensional axis of the three dimensional assemblage. (E.g., U.S. Pat.No. 5,691,054 hereby incorporated by reference). Generally, assemblages(including but not limited to mats and plugs) are formed byde-aggregating carbon nanotube aggregates, and then reassembling them toform assemblages which have uniform properties over a greater range ofdistance than the original aggregates. Nanotube mats or assemblages havebeen prepared by dispersing carbon nanotubes in aqueous or organicmediums and then filtering the nanotubes to form a mat or assemblage.Mats and plugs have also been prepared by forming a gel or paste ofnanotubes in a fluid, e.g. an organic solvent such as propane and thenheating the gel or paste to a temperature above the critical temperatureof the medium, removing the supercritical fluid and finally removing theresultant porous mat or plug from the vessel in which the process hasbeen carried out. A gluing agent may be present during the step of mator plug formation. As the assemblage dries, the glue will concentrate atthe nanotube intersections. Preferred gluing agents or binders includecellulose-based polymers, hydroxyl ethyl cellulose, carboxyl methylcellulose, cellulose, carbohydrates, polyethylene, polystyrene, nylon,polyurethane, polyester, polyamides, poly(dimethylsiloxane), acrylicpolymers and phenolic resins. Preferably, the polymers are free ofalkali metal salts such as sodium or potassium salts.

b. Rigid porous structures are formed by either linking the individualfunctionalized carbon nanotubes together without the use of a linkingmolecule, or by gluing carbon nanotube aggregates together with a gluingagent. U.S. Pat. No. 6,099,965, hereby incorporated by reference,discloses that certain functionalized nanotubes become self adhesiveafter an appropriate thermal treatment. The carbon nanotubes arefunctionalized, for example, by contacting them with an appropriatereagent (e.g., WO 97/32571, U.S. Pat. No. 6,203,814, all of which areherein incorporated by reference), or by contacting them with anoxidizing agent such as potassium chlorate (KClO₃), sulfuric acid(H₂SO₄), nitric acid (HNO₃), persulfate, hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), CO₂,O₂, steam, N₂O, NO, NO₂, O₃, ClO₂, etc. (e.g., U.S. Pat No. 5,965,470,WO 95/07316, PCT/US00/18670 or WO 01/07694, all of which are hereinincorporated by reference). The oxidized nanotubes are believed to formester, anhydride, lactone and ether bonds between themselves.

When a gluing agent is employed, the nanotubes may be unfunctionalizedand may be used as individual tubes or in their aggregated form.Preferred gluing agents or binders include cellulose-based polymers,hydroxyl ethyl cellulose, carboxyl methyl cellulose, cellulose,carbohydrates, polyethylene, polystyrene, nylon, polyurethane,polyester, polyamides, poly(dimethylsiloxane), acrylic polymers andphenolic resins. Preferably, the polymers are free of alkali metal saltssuch as sodium or potassium salts.

Forming generally accepted forms of industrial catalyst support includespelletization, extrusion, compaction or powder agglomeration asindicated in “Catalyse de Contact” edited by J. F. Le Page, Paris, 1978,hereby incorporated by reference. Rigid porous structures mayadvantageously be made by extruding a paste like suspension offunctionalized nanotubes or a mixture of as made aggregates and gluingagent, (optionally admixed with a liquid vehicle) followed by acalcinations step to drive off conveying liquids and either cross linkthe functionalized nanotubes or to pyrolize the gluing agent.

While activated charcoals and other materials have been used ascatalysts and catalyst supports, none have heretofore had all of therequisite qualities of high surface area, porosity, pore sizedistribution, resistance to attrition and purity for the conduct of avariety of selected petrochemical and refining processes as compared tocarbon nanotube structures. Furthermore, unlike carbon nanotubestructures, much of the surface area in activated charcoals and othermaterials is in the form of inaccessible micropores.

Therefore, it would be desirable to provide a supported catalystcomprising a carbon nanotube structure with well or evenly dispersedmetal catalysts therein, the supported catalyst consequently havinghighly accessible surface area, high porosity, and attrition resistance,and which are substantially micropore free, highly active, highlyselective and are capable of extended use with no significantdeactivation.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A new method for preparing supported catalysts is provided comprisingthe steps of loading metal catalyst onto carbon nanotubes to form metalloaded carbon nanotubes; and forming a carbon nanotube structure fromsaid metal loaded carbon nanotubes.

Preferably, the supported catalysts are prepared by a process comprisingthe steps of functionalizing carbon nanotubes with a functionalizingagent to form functionalized carbon nanotubes; loading metal catalystonto said functionalized carbon nanotubes to form metal loaded carbonnanotubes; and forming a carbon nanotubes rigid porous structure fromsaid metal loaded carbon nanotubes. Desirably, the dispersion of themetal catalysts in the carbon nanotube structure is equal to or greaterthan the dispersion of the metal catalysts in the original metal loadedcarbon nanotubes.

The most straightforward functionalization, especially useful formulti-wall nanotubes is oxidation. Useful oxidizing agents include, butis not limited to, potassium chlorate, sulfuric acid, nitric acid(HNO₃), persulfate, hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), CO₂, O₂, steam, N₂O, NO,NO₂, O₃, or ClO₂.

Catalysts or catalyst precursors useful in the methods of the presentinvention include, but are not limited to, metals such as ruthenium,osmium, rhodium, iridium, palladium, platinum, silver, gold or a mixturethereof, as well as oxides, halides, carbides, nitrides, phosphides andsulfides of other transition metals including but not limited to Ti, V,Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Y, Zr, Nb, Mo, La, Ce, W or combinationsthereof. The metal catalysts or metal catalyst precursors may be loadedonto the nanotubes by any known method, such as ion exchange,impregnation, or incipient wetness, precipitation, physical or chemicaladsorption or co-precipitation. In the preferred embodiment, the metalcatalysts are predeposited or loaded onto the functionalized carbonnanotubes by ion exchange, i.e. mixing a solution containing salts ofsaid metal catalysts with the functionalized carbon nanotubes, allowingthe salts to react with the functional groups of the functionalizednanotubes and evaporating the remaining solution (e.g., the excesssolvent from the solution ). Alternatively, the metal catalysts arepredeposited or loaded onto carbon nanotubes by impregnation, orincipient wetness, i.e. wetting a mass of carbon nanotubes with asolution of metal salts and evaporating the solvent. Alternatively,metal salts may be caused to precipitate from solution in the presenceof a mass of carbon nanotubes causing said precipitated metal salts tophysically or chemically adsorb on said nanotubes, followed byevaporation of the solvent.

Preferably, the carbon nanotube structure is a rigid porous structureformed by extruding the metal loaded carbon nanotubes. The metal loadedrigid porous structure may be further calcined to improve structuralintegrity.

Alternatively, the structure may be an assemblage formed by filtering asuspension of metal loaded carbon nanotubes. These conveniently take theform of thin mats especially useful in electrocatalysis. The metalloaded assemblage may be further calcined to improve structuralintegrity.

Alternatively, the carbon nanotube structure is a rigid porous structureformed by extruding said metal loaded carbon nanotubes with gluingagents or binders selected from the group consisting of cellulose-basedpolymers, hydroxyl ethyl cellulose, carboxyl methyl cellulose,cellulose, carbohydrates, polyethylene, polystyrene, nylon,polyurethane, polyester, polyamides, poly(dimethylsiloxane), acrylicpolymers and phenolic resins. Preferably, the polymers are free ofalkali metal salts such as sodium or potassium salts. An assemblage canalso be formed by filtration of metal loaded carbon nanotubes from asuspension in which a gluing agent is also present. As the assemblagedries, the gluing agent wick to the nanotubes intersections. Again,these assemblage are conveniently in the form of mats useful forelectrocatalysis.

Any of these glued structures are desiderably rigidized by calcining.Calcination may be carried out in the presence of absence of air. Whenair is present, calcinations temperature is limited to less than about300° C. Calcination in inert atmosphere may be carried out attemperatures of about 300° C. to about 900° C.

Other improvements which the present invention provides over the priorart will be identified as a result of the following description whichsets forth the preferred embodiments of the present invention. Thedescription is not in any way intended to limit the scope of the presentinvention, but rather only to provide a working example of the presentpreferred embodiments. The scope of the present invention will bepointed out in the appended claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute apart of the specification, illustrate an exemplary embodiment of thepresent invention.

FIG. 1 displays the results of the hydrogenation of cyclohexene using0.5 wt % supported Pd catalysts in powder and extrudate form as preparedin accordance with Example 2.

FIG. 2 displays the results of the hydrogenation of cyclohexene using0.5 wt % supported Pd catalysts in powder and extrudate form as preparedin accordance with Example 2.

FIG. 3 displays the results of the hydrogenation of cyclohexene using0.5 wt % supported Pd catalysts in powder and pellet form as prepared inaccordance with Example 3.

FIG. 4 displays the results of the hydrogenation of cyclohexene using0.5 wt % supported Pd catalysts in powder and pellet for as prepared inaccordance with Example 3.

FIG. 5 displays the results of the hydrogenation of cyclohexene using0.5 wt % supported Pd catalysts as prepared in accordance with Example4.

FIG. 6 displays the results of the hydrogenation of cyclohexene using0.2 wt % supported Pd catalysts as prepared in accordance with Example5.

FIG. 7 is a flow chart illustrating the various embodiments of thepresent invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

All patents, patent applications, and patent publications referred toherein are incorporated by reference in their entirety.

Definitions

The terms “nanotube”, “nanofiber” and “fibril” are used interchangeablyto refer to single walled or multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Each refersto an elongated structure preferably having a cross section (e.g.,angular fibers having edges) or a diameter (e.g., rounded) less than 1micron (for multiwalled nanotubes) or less than 5 nm (for single wallednanotubes). The term “nanotube” also includes “buckytubes”, and fishbonefibrils.

“Aggregate” refers to a dense, microscopic particulate structures ofentangled carbon nanotubes.

“Assemblage” refers to structures having relatively or substantiallyuniform physical properties along at least one dimensional axis anddesirably having relatively or substantially uniform physical propertiesin one or more planes within the assemblage, i.e., they have isotropicphysical properties in that plane. The assemblage may comprise uniformlydispersed individual interconnected nanotubes or a mass of connectedaggregates of nanotubes. In other embodiments, the entire assemblage isrelatively or substantially isotropic with respect to one or more of itsphysical properties. The physical properties which can be easilymeasured and by which uniformity or isotropy are determined includeresistivity and optical density.

“Graphenic” carbon is a form of carbon whose carbon atoms are eachlinked to three other carbon atoms in an essentially planar layerforming hexagonal fused rings. The layers are platelets having only afew rings in their diameter or ribbons having many rings in their lengthbut only a few rings in their width.

“Graphitic” carbon consists of layers which are essentially parallel toone another and no more than 3.6 angstroms apart.

“Internal structure” refers to the internal structure of a carbonnanotube structure including the relative orientation of the carbonnanotubes, the diversity of and overall average of nanotubeorientations, the proximity of the nanotubes to one another, the voidspace or pores created by the interstices and spaces between the fibersand size, shape, number and orientation of the flow channels or pathsformed by the connection of the void spaces and/or pores. According toanother embodiment, the structure may also include characteristicsrelating to the size, spacing and orientation of aggregate particlesthat form the assemblage. The term “relative orientation” refers to theorientation of an individual nanotube or aggregate with respect to theothers (i.e., aligned versus non-aligned). The “diversity of” and“overall average” of nanotube or aggregate orientations refers to therange of nanotube orientations within the structure (alignment andorientation with respect to the external surface of the structure).

“Isotropic” means that all measurements of a physical property within aplane or volume of the structure, independent of the direction of themeasurement, are of a constant value. It is understood that measurementsof such non-solid compositions must be taken on a representative sampleof the structure so that the average value of the void spaces is takeninto account.

“Macropore” refers to a pore which has a diameter of greater than orequal to 50 nm.

“Mesopore” refers to a pore which has a diameter of greater than orequal to 2 nm but less than 50 nm.

“Micropore” refers to a pore which has a diameter of less than 2 nm.

“Nonuniform pore structure” refers to a pore structure occurring whenindividual discrete nanotubes are distributed in a substantiallynonuniform manner with substantially nonuniform spacings betweennanotubes.

“Physical property” means an inherent, measurable property of the porousstructure, e.g., surface area, resistivity, fluid flow characteristics,density, porosity, etc.

“Pore” traditionally refers to an opening or depression in the surfaceof a catalyst or catalyst support. Catalysts and catalyst supportscomprising carbon nanotubes lack such traditional pores. Rather, inthese materials, the spaces between individual nanotubes behave as (andare referred to herein as) pores, and the equivalent pore size ofnanotube aggregates can be measured by conventional methods(porosimetry) of measuring pore size and pore size distribution. Byvarying the density and structure of aggregates, the equivalent poresize and pore size distribution can be varied.

“Relatively” means that 95% of the values of the physical property whenmeasured along an axis of, or within a plane of or within a volume ofthe structure, as the case may be, will be within plus or minus 20% of amean value.

“Substantially” or “predominantly” mean that 95% of the values of thephysical property when measured along an axis of, or within a plane ofor within a volume of the structure, as the case may be, will be withinplus or minus 10% of a mean value.

“Surface area” refers to the total surface area of a substancemeasurable by the BET technique as known in the art, a physisorptiontechnique. Nitrogen or helium can be used as absorbents to measure thesurface area.

“Uniform pore structure” refers to a pore structure occurring whenindividual discrete nanotubes or nanofibers form the structure. In thesecases, the distribution of individual nanotubes in the particles issubstantially uniform with substantially regular spacings between thenanotubes. These spacings (analogous to pores in conventional supports)vary according to the densities of the structures.

Methods of the Preferred Embodiments

The present invention provides a new process for preparing supportedcatalysts comprising a metal loaded carbon nanotube structure. Thesupported catalysts prepared in accordance with the preferred embodimentresults in a better distribution and better dispersion of the metalcatalysts within the carbon nanotube structure, and consequently canyield better catalytic activity.

The method of the preferred embodiment comprises loading the metalcatalyst onto carbon nanotubes and forming a carbon nanotube structurefrom the loaded carbon nanotubes. As used throughout this application,the term “metal catalyst” includes precursors of such metal catalyst.That is, metal catalyst includes metals such as ruthenium, osmium,rhodium, iridium, palladium, platinum, silver, gold or a mixturethereof, as well as oxides, halides, carbides, nitrides, phosphides andsulfides of other transition metals including but not limited to Ti, V,Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Y, Zr, Nb, Mo, La, Ce, W or combinationsthereof.

Preferably, the carbon nanotubes are functionalized before loading themetal catalysts, and the carbon nanotube structure is a rigid porousstructure formed by extruding the metal loaded carbon nanotubes. Thecarbon nanotube structure containing the metal catalysts represent thesupported catalyst. When metal catalysts (in the form of precursors ofmetal catalyst) are loaded onto the carbon nanotube, variouspost-extrusion treatment such as calcinations, reduction, carburization,nitrodization, phosphurization and sulphurization can be applied toobtain the desired catalyst composition.

As such, the terms supported catalyst and supported metal catalyst asused in this application may refer to any of: the inert support withmetal salt (or active material precursor) deposited thereon; the samematerial after calcination or other pre-reaction treatment; or the inertsupport with active material thereon having whatever composition ittakes on in the reaction zone.

Functionalization

In the preferred embodiment, carbon nanotubes (whether produced in theform of discrete nanotubes or as-made aggregates, or mixture of both)are predeposited or loaded with metal catalysts before the metal loadedcarbon nanotubes are extruded or otherwise made into a carbon nanotubestructure. All types of carbon nanotubes as produced, whether it besingle walled or multi walled, can be used.

A preferred method to accomplish the predeposition or loading of themetal catalyst onto the carbon nanotube is to first functionalize thecarbon nanotube surface before mixing with the metal catalyst or saltthereof. Functionalizing the carbon nanotubes results in thesubstitution of functional groups such as oxygen containing moietiesonto the surface of the carbon nanotubes, which consequently results inbetter attachment of the metal catalyst to the carbon nanotube surface(whether by adsorption, hydrogen bond, adhesion, electrostaticattraction, covalent bond, absorption, van der Waals force, or any othermechanism which may occur to secure, support, hold or otherwise keep themetal catalyst onto the carbon nanotube surface). A good survey articleon functionalization, hereby included in its entirety by reference,covering both single wall and multiwall tubes is: Hirsch, A. andVostrowsky, O., “Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes,” Topics inCurrent Chemistry, (2005)245:193-237.

Functionalization can be accomplished, for example, by contacting thecarbon nanotubes with an appropriate reagent (e.g., WO 97/32571, U.S.Pat. No. 6,203,814, all of which are herein incorporated by reference),or preferably by contacting them with an oxidizing agent such aspotassium chlorate, sulfuric acid, nitric acid (HNO₃), persulfate,hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), CO₂, O₂, steam, N₂O, NO, NO₂, O₃, ClO₂, etc.(e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,965,470, WO 95/07316, PCT/US00/18670 or WO01/07694, all of which are herein incorporated by reference).

Where the carbon nanotubes are in the form of aggregates, it ispreferred to both break up or de-aggregate the aggregates andfunctionalize them. Such tasks can be accomplished concurrently byoxidizing the carbon nanotube aggregates, for example, by contactingthem with an oxidizing agent such as potassium chlorate, sulfuric acid,nitric acid (HNO₃), persulfate, hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), CO₂, O₂,steam, N₂O, NO, NO₂, O₃, ClO₂, etc. (e.g, U.S. Pat. No. 5,965,470, WO95/07316, PCT/US00/18670 or WO 01/07694, all of which are hereinincorporated by reference). Breaking up of the as-produced aggregatesinto individual carbon nanotubes is preferable (although not necessary)in order to permit a more thorough distribution of functional groupsonto the carbon nanotube surfaces, as well as to easier facilitate thecreation of other carbon nanotube structures such as assemblages, mats,rigid porous structures, etc. Hence, when oxidizing agents are used, theterms “functionalized” and “oxidized” may be used interchangably.

In an exemplary embodiment, the carbon nanotubes are oxidized bycontacting the nanotubes with ozone under conditions suitable to achievethe desired functionalization (and deaggregation in the case of carbonnanotubes which are in the form of aggregates). Further details areprovided in U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/621,132, filed Oct. 22,2004 entitled “OZONOLYSIS OF CARBON NANOTUBES,” herein incorporated byreference. A particularly useful functionalization method especially forsingle wall tubes is cycloaddition. See, for example, Holzinger, M., etal. “[2+1] cycloaddition for cross linking SWCNTs,” Carbon 42 (2004)941-947 and Georgakilas, V. et al. “Organic Functionalization of CarbonNanotubes,” JACS Communications, 124 (2002) 760, 761, both of which arehereby included by reference. Alternatively, single wall tubes can befunctionalized as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No.10/875,435, filed Jun. 23, 2004.

Another useful purpose served by functionalization is that thefunctional groups which remain after the deposition or loading of themetal catalyst permit the individual carbon nanotubes to be linked viathose remaining functional groups or sites to form additional carbonnanotube structures such as assemblages, rigid porous structures, etc.The remaining functional groups may be linked or cross linked usingknown techniques, such as crosslinking agents, calcination, pyrolysis,carbonization, etc.

The subsequent creation of these additional carbon nanotube structurescan also be accomplished using any of the following methods orcombinations: extrusion, gluing agents, cross linking, pyrolysis,carbonization, etc. (e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,031,711, U.S. Pat. No.6,099,965, etc., all of which are hereby incorporated by reference).

Predeposition or Loading of Metal Catalysts

Preferred metal catalysts include ruthenium, osmium, rhodium, iridium,palladium, platinum, silver, gold or a mixture thereof, as well asoxides, halides, carbides, nitrides, phosphides and sulfides of othertransition metals including but not limited to Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co,Ni, Cu, Zn, Y, Zr, Nb, Mo, La, Ce, W or combinations thererof. Morepreferably, the metal catalyst is palladium, platinum, or a mixturethereof.

Where the carbon nanotubes are previously functionalized, predepositionor loading of the metal catalyst onto the carbon nanotube surface can beaccomplished by mixing the metal catalyst material with the carbonnanotubes. Due to the change in carbon nanotube surface chemistry causedby the presence of functional groups, the metal catalyst may be held orsupported onto the carbon nanotube surface via adsorption, hydrogenbond, adhesion, electrostatic attraction, covalent bond, absorption, vander Waals force or any other mechanism which may occur to secure,support, hold or otherwise keep the metal catalyst onto the carbonnanotube surface. It is preferred, where the functional groups are usedto subsequently link the individual nanotubes to form carbon nanotubestructures, that the amount of metal deposited or loaded onto the carbonnanotube surface not exceed or otherwise “use up” the functional groupsneeded to hold or support the metal catalyst on the carbon nanotubesurface. In other words, it is preferred that there be free functionalgroups remaining on the carbon nanotube surface after the predepositionor loading of the metal catalyst.

Furthermore, the metal catalysts can be introduced to the carbonnanotubes in the form of a salt or derivative, or in the form ofmetal-containing micelles. As discussed earlier, these forms are oftenreferred to as precursors of the metal catalyst, but are included in theterm metal catalysts as used in this application. For example, the metalcan be introduced to the carbon nanotube in the form of a water-solublesalt such as nitrate, acetate or chloride. Metal catalysts which havebeen loaded onto the carbon nanotube as salts are then preferablyreduced via a reducing agent to further accomplish the deposition of themetal catalyst onto the carbon nanotube surface. Additionally, it ispreferred in the case of metal catalysts introduced as a metal salt in asolution, that the solvent component of the solution be subsequentlyevaporated.

Any conventional mixing devices or mechanism can be employed. Factorssuch as mixing speed or time can be adjusted accordingly to facilitatethe contact of the carbon nanotube and the metal catalyst, and to spreadthe metal catalyst thoroughly throughout the mixture so as to create abetter distribution of metal catalysts on the carbon nanotubes.

Additional methods for accomplishing predeposition of the metal catalystonto the carbon nanotube surface include, but is not limited to,impregnation, incipient wetness, ion exchange, precipitation, physicalor chemical adsorption and co-precipitation.

Carbon nanotubes which have metal catalysts deposited on them will bereferred to as “predeposited carbon nanotubes” or “metal loaded carbonnanotubes.”

Structures

Once the metal catalysts have been deposited onto the surfaces of thecarbon nanotubes, these metal loaded carbon nanotubes are then used toform carbon nanotube structures such as assemblages, rigid porousstructures, etc. using conventional methods as previously described.These methods may include extrusion, pelletizing, compaction, etc.

In the preferred embodiment, the carbon nanotube structure is formed byextruding the metal loaded carbon nanotubes to create a rigid porouscarbon nanotube structure (also known as extrudates). Extrusion can beaccomplished using any conventional extrusion device such as a die,single screw or twin screw extruder. The speed or rate of extrusion willvary depending on the amount of materials to be extruded.

The above-described rigid porous structures are formed by causing thenanotubes to form bonds or become glued with other nanotubes at thenanotube intersections. The bonding can be induced by chemicalmodification of the surface of the nanotubes to promote bonding, byadding “gluing” agents and/or by pyrolyzing the nanofibers to causefusion or bonding at the interconnect points. U.S. Pat. No. 6,099,965 toTennent, herein incorporated by reference, describes processes forforming rigid porous structures from carbon nanotubes.

The metal loaded carbon nanotubes are introduced to the extruder in theform of a slurry. Preferred slurry carriers include water and othernon-reactive solvents. Extrusion subjects the metal loaded carbonnanotubes to compressive and shear forces which creates a wet product ina commercially desirable shape. The extruder effluent is normallychopped into a convenient pellet shape before drying and calcination.

In accordance with the preferred embodiment, because the metal catalystshave already been deposited, spread and distributed throughout thecarbon nanotubes in its discrete form prior to creating the carbonnanotube structure, the result is that the carbon nanotube structureitself would also have a greater and/or more even distribution of metalcatalyst throughout and within the structure. Furthermore, because ofthe porosity characteristics (e.g., more meso and macropores) of thecarbon nanotube structure, the accessibility and availability of themetal catalyst for reactions is greater than in other support catalyststructures previously prepared. This availability improvement isespecially significant for liquid phase reactions, where larger poresare needed in order for the liquid phase reactants to reach the internalmetal catalysts.

Furthermore, the carbon nanotube structure prepared by the preferredembodiment will also have at least the same or greater amount of metalcatalyst dispersion compared to the metal loaded carbon nanotubes priorto extrusion. Catalyst dispersion measures the percent of the metalcatalyst particle that is available for reaction. In other words, a 40%metal catalyst dispersion means that only 40% of that metal catalystparticle is available for reaction—the remaining 60% is unavailable forreaction (e.g., it is bound to the carbon nanotube surface, the middlemass of the particle is unavailable as well, etc.) Catalyst dispersionmay be measured by determining the amount of gas such as carbon monoxideadsorbed on the carbon nanotube surface. Thus, in the preferredembodiment, for example, metal loaded carbon nanotubes having a 50%metal catalyst dispersion prior to extrusion will, in accordance withthe preferred embodiment, have at least 50% or greater metal catalystdispersion in the resulting carbon nanotube structure after extrusion.Consequently, supported catalysts (i.e., the carbon nanotube structurecontaining the metal catalyst) prepared according to the preferredembodiment are superior to other known supported catalysts wherecatalyst dispersion may undesirably decrease (e.g., shear forces causeindividual particles to lump together, thereby reducing the amount ofthe catalyst particle that is available to participate in a chemicalreaction).

Once extruded, the extrudates may be dried and calcined. Calcination maybe done in air or inert gases at temperatures ranging from 100-300° C.The extrudates may be further reduced with hydrogen or reacted withother reagents to yield carbides, nitrides, phosphides or sulphides.Alternatively, the extrudate may be pyrolyzed or carbonized attemperatures greater than 400° C. to cause fusion or bonding at theinterconnect points, followed by passivation at room temperature.

In another alternative embodiment, gluing agents and/or binders may beused to further improve the mechanical strength of the extrudate by, forexample, promoting bonding among the carbon nanotubes within the rigidporous structure. Specifically, gluing agents or water soluble polymericbinders can be added to the slurry before extruding the metal loadedcarbon nanotubes. Examples of these binders include cellulose-basedpolymers such as hydroxyl ethyl cellulose and carboxyl methyl cellulose.Other examples of gluing agents or binders include, without limitation,cellulose, carbohydrates, polyethylene, polystyrene, nylon,polyurethane, polyester, polyamides, poly(dimethylsiloxane), phenolicresins, acrylic polymers and the like. Preferably, the polymers are freeof alkali metal salts such as sodium or potassium salts.

Addition of gluing agents can also be coupled with dispersing metalprecursors in polymeric reagents to form metal nanoclusters, also knownas metal loaded micelles. These micelles are generated from anamphiphilic block copolymer such as poly(styrene-block-acrylic acid)(PS-b-PAA) in solution which are capable of self-organizing into orderedstructures on surfaces. This allows for the creation of quasi-hexagonalarrays of PAA spheres within in a PS matrix. The carboxylic acids groupsin the PAA domains can be utilized in an ion-exchange protocol toselectively seize metal ions. The resulting metal-containingnanoclusters are nearly monodisperse in size (diameter <10 nm) andpatterned at a density of approximately 10¹¹ particles per cm².Furthermore, it is possible to control the cluster size and spacing byaltering the molecular weight of the block copolymer, for example,choose a lower molecular weight polymer will consequently result in theformation of smaller micelle size which will further translate intosmaller metal cluster size.

In the preferred embodiment, the supported catalyst comprises a rigidporous structure substantially free of micropores, having a surface areagreater than 100 m²/gm and a crush strength greater than 5 psi forextrudates of ⅛ inch in diameter. Preferably the surface area of therigid porous structure is greater than 200 m²/gm, more preferablybetween 250 and 1000 m²/gm. Carbon nanotube extrudates may havedensities greater that 0.2 gm/cm³, preferably greater than 0.3 gm/cm³,which can be controlled by the density of the extrusion paste. Apreferred range includes 0.3 gm/cm³-1.0 gm/cm³. The extrudates haveliquid absorption volumes greater than about 0.7 cm³/gm.

It is further preferred that the extrudates have an equal or higherlevel of metal catalyst dispersion compared to the metal loaded carbonnanotubes prior to extrusion. The metal catalyst dispersion can bemeasured using conventional chemisorption (i.e., chemical adsorption)techniques, and are often referred to as “apparent” dispersion. Forexample, in measuring the dispersion of a metal catalyst such aspalladium in a carbon nanotube structure, carbon monoxide is usuallyused since molecules of CO are known to bond to the Pd atom such thatthe apparent dispersion of the Pd catalyst throughout the carbonnanotube may be calculated or measured.

It has been discovered that self-supported catalysts comprising carbonnanotube structures have high internal void volumes that ameliorate theplugging problem encountered in various processes. Moreover, thepreponderance of large pores obviates the problems often encountered indiffusion or mass transfer limited reactions. The high porositiesfurther increases catalyst life.

These catalytic compositions can be used as catalysts to catalyzereactions such as hydrogenation, hydrodesulfurisation,hydrodenitrogenation, hydrodemetallisation, hydrodeoxygenation,hydrodearomatization, dehydrogenation, hydrogenolysis, isomerization,alkylation, dealkylation, transalkylation, hydroformylation,water-shift, Fischer-Trosch, COx-free hydrogen production, ammoniasynthesis, electrocatalysis, oxidation, florination, and NO_(x)reduction.

EXAMPLES

The examples are illustrative and not to be considered restrictive ofthe scope of the invention. Numerous changes and modification can bemade with respect to the invention. The materials used in the examplesherein are readily commercially available.

In all of the experiments which follow, aggregates of carbon nanotubesas manufactured by Hyperion Catalysis International of Cambridge, Mass.were used. The aggregates of carbon nanotubes were of the cotton candy(“CC”) morphology also known as combed yam (“CY”).

Terms

Where convenient, the following terms may be used in the followingexamples:

“HNO₃ oxidized CC carbon nanotube powders” refer to samples of CC carbonnanotube aggregates which were subsequently oxidized with HNO₃, and thenground into powder form.

“Pd/nanotube extrudate” refers to samples of extrudates which have beenloaded with Pd metal catalyst. The Pd catalyst may be loaded before orafter the extrudate was formed, depending on the process used in theexample.

“Pd/nanotube powder” refers samples of oxidized carbon nanotubes whichhave been loaded with Pd, and have not yet been extruded.

“Pd/nanotube pellets” refers to samples of pellets which have beenloaded with Pd metal catalyst. The Pd catalyst may be loaded before orafter the pellet was formed, depending on the process used in theexample.

Example 1

HNO₃ oxidized CC carbon nanotube powders were created by pre-grindingHNO₃ oxidized CC carbon nanotubes and sieved with a 20 mesh sieve. 70 mlof PdAc₂/acetone solution containing 0.148 g of PdAc₂ was poured into aporcelain crucible with 7.0 g of HNO₃ oxidized CC carbon nanotubepowders to create a slurry, which was then stirred with a magneticstirrer. After vaporizing most of the solvent at room temperature, theslush-like cake was dried under vacuum at 100° C. for 1-2 hrs.

The extrusion procedure was carried out with a Brabender device.(PLASTI-CORDER® 3/4” Laboratory Extruder. The screw has 25 flites and acompression ratio of 3:1). 14.0 g of deionized (“DI”) water were addedto 6.0 g of 1 wt % Pd/nanotube powders at room temperature. The solidcontent in this dry-look mixture is around 30%. The mixture was extrudedat room temperature and 30 RPM, and resulting extrudates were dried at100-110° C. in a vacuum oven.

Two batches of extrudates were made from two different batches of HNO₃oxidized CC nanotubes. The properties of these two batches of carbonnanotubes are listed in the following Table 1. The two batches were madeunder the same conditions. However, Batch 1 was kept as wet cakes afterthe nitric acid oxidation process, then dried before loading Pd. Batch 2was made into an extrudate and then ground before loading Pd. TABLE 1HNO₃-oxidized CC nanotube powders Batch Titer (meqv/g) Appearance 1 1.0Wet cake, freshly dried before loading Pd 2 1.0 Extrudates, ground topowders

The physical properties of Pd/nanotube extrudates such as apparent Pddispersion and particle size were examined using carbon monoxide (CO)chemisorption at room temperature assuming one CO molecule adsorbed onone Pd atom. Prior to CO chemisorption, the sample was in situ reducedunder flowing H₂ at 300° C. for 2 hrs, followed by 30 min evacuation at300° C. The results are, presented in Table 2. TABLE 2 Pd Pd Pd Particleloading Finger dispersion size Batch # (wt %) Appearance Smash Test (%)(nm) 1 1 Powder N/A 49.3 2.3 Extrudate Can 46.2 2.4 2 1 Powder N/A 50.12.2 Extrudate Can't 52.6 2.1

As shown in Table 2, both batches of the Pd/nanotube powder prior toextrusion had very similar apparent Pd dispersions (e.g., 49.3% vs.50.1%). After the batches were extruded, the apparent Pd dispersiondiffered between the Pd/nanotube extrudates (e.g., 46.2% vs. 52.6%), butwithin experimental error. More importantly, these data show thatnanotubes with Pd pre-deposition can be fabricated into extrudate withessentially no loss in dispersion.

It was further observed that the two batch extrudates also exhibiteddifferent strength. The Batch 1 extrudate could be smashed by a fingerand thus, did not pass finger smash test. On the other hand, the Batch 2extrudate could not be smashed by a finger, indicating that it is astronger structure.

To further examine structural strength, the batch extrudates weresubjected to crush strength tests. The batches were first calcined underH₂ for 2 hours. To eliminate the possibility that calcination under H₂might remove some oxygen functional groups and consequently weaken crushstrength, calcination under Ar was also carried out for a sample fromBatch 1, the already weaker of the two batch extrudates. The results arereported in Table 3. TABLE 3 Weight Crush strength (Lb/in) Batch #Calcination loss (wt) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Average Deviation 1 300° C./H₂/2 hr9.2 0.36 0.33 0.39 0.25 0.33 0.33 0.05 300° C./Ar/2 hr 8.4 0.3 0.5 0.40.4 1.3 0.7 0.4 0.6 0.3 2 300° C./H₂/2 hr 7.0 17 8 5 4 13 1 2 7 6

Since the crush strength for the Batch 1 extrudates calcined under Arwas greater than the crush strength for the Batch 1 extrudates calcinedunder H₂, these results confirm that calcination under H₂ can cause adecline of crush strength.

Table 3 confirms that the Batch 2 extrudates have higher crush strengthsand thus are structurally stronger than the Batch 1 extrudates. TheBatch 2 extrudates have an average crush strength around 7 lb/in,although with a large standard deviation.

To further study the effect of Pd loading on crush strength, extrudateswere made from Batch 2 without loading the Pd catalyst. The crushstrength of the extrudates made from Batch 2 nanotubes with and withoutPd loading were examined, and the results are displayed in Table 4:TABLE 4 Weight Crush strength (Lb/in) Batch # Calcination loss (wt) 1 23 4 5 6 7 Average Deviation 2 w/o Pd 300° C./Ar/2 hr 5.1 25 18 3 4 10 622 13 9 2 300° C./H₂/2 hr 7.0 17 8 5 4 13 1 2 7 6

The results of Table 4 indicate that the Pd/nanotube extrudates of Batch2 have lesser crush strength than nanotube extrudates of Batch 2 whichdo not have any Pd loading.

Example 2

Comparison between the following two supported catalysts were made: (a)extrudates which have been loaded with Pd after extrusion vs. (b) CCnanotube powders which have been loaded with Pd and not extruded.

Extrudates were made from plain CC nanotubes with PAM-3K polymer binder,and calcined in Ar at 600° C. for 2 hrs. The extrudates were thenoxidized with ozone in gas phase for 48 hrs at room temperature. Theacid titer exhibited upon titration was about 0.968meq/g. Pd was loadedon the extrudates by ion exchange in Pd(NH₃)₄(NO₃)₂ solution at roomtemperature. The nominal loading of Pd is about 0.5 wt %.

Supported catalysts comprising Pd catalyst supported on powder CCnanotubes were made in a similar way. Namely, powder CC nanotubes wereoxidized with ozone in gas phase for 48 hrs at room temperature. Theacid titer exhibited upon titration was about 1.35 meq/g. Pd was loadedon the powder by ion exchange in Pd(NH₃)₄(NO₃)₂ solution at roomtemperature. The nominal loading of Pd is about 0.5 wt %.

The apparent Pd dispersion in the two types of supported catalysts weremeasured by CO chemisorption at room temperature. The measurement was asfollows: 37.4% for Pd/nanotube extrudates; 47.9% for supportedPd/nanotube powders.

Next, catalytic activity of the two supported catalyts in cyclohexenehydrogenation was examined. The Pd extrudates were crushed into granulesof 20-40 meshes, and reduced in situ with 40 ml/min of H₂ at 300° C. for2 hr. The Pd/nanotube powders were not altered. 10 mg of each supportedcatalyst were loaded in the reactor and the cyclohexene hydrogenationwas conducted at ambient temperature and pressure. Cyclohexene wasbubbled into the reactor with 20 ml/min of H₂ and 40 ml/min of Ar tobalance the total flow. The ratio of H₂ to Ar was therefore 1 to 2. Theresults are shown in FIGS. 1 and 2.

The difference in performance between the catalysts is more dramaticthan one would expect from the difference in dispersion. Thus, not onlyis attainment of high dispersion on preformed extrudate problematical,(37.4 vs 47.9%), but reaction performance is poorer than can beaccounted for by the dispersion difference alone. Because Pd metalcatalysts were loaded onto the extrudate (instead of onto the carbonnanotubes before forming the extrudate) it is theorized that the lowcatalytic activity was caused by the nonuniform distribution of Pd atomsin the extrudates. In other words, it is believed that there is adiffusion problem for Pd ions from outside to interior of extrudate. Itis also highly possible that most Pd ions anchored on the nanotubes werelocated near the external surface of extrudate, with only a smallportion of Pd in the interior of extrudate. This would result in largePd particles in the external area and small Pd particles in the interiorarea of extrudate. Therefore, the apparent Pd dispersion decreased. Whenthe extrudates were crushed, some granules have high Pd loading withlarge Pd particles, while others have low Pd loading with small Pdparticles, and yet others granules might not have any Pd particles. Lowcatalytic activity is expected when the granules with large or no Pdparticles dominate the supported catalyst mixture.

Example 3

Pd was loaded onto HNO₃ oxidized CC nanotubes (i.e., CC aggregates whichhave been oxidized with HNO₃) via ion exchange at room temperature inPd(NH₃)₄(NO₃)₂ solution. The solution was evaporated and nanotubes with0.5 wt % Pd supported thereon remained. The Pd/nanotubes were ground topowder. 0.6 g of H₂O were added to 0.2 g of the Pd/nanotube powders.Half of the wet powder mixture was put into a ½″ pellet die. The die waspressured under 1,500 psi at room temperature for about 30 seconds. Thethickness of the pellet is about 1.7 mm. The pellet was dried undervacuum at 100° C. for 3 hrs. The apparent Pd dispersions were measuredby CO chemisorption for the Pd/nanotube powders (i.e., prior to diepress) and the pellets (i.e., die pressed). The results are displayed inTable 5. TABLE 5 Loading Pd dispersion Pd particle Catalyst (wt %) Form(%) size (nm) Pd 0.5 Powder 50.0 2.2 Pd 0.5 Pellet 58.5 1.9

Table 5 revealed that the Pd/nanotube pellet has higher apparent Pddispersion than the Pd/nanotube powder.

Furthermore, the catalytic activity of these supported catalysts wereexamined for cyclohexene hydrogenation using the same conditions asExample 2 and the results are shown in FIGS. 3 and 4. FIGS. 3 and 4revealed that Pd/nanotube pellets had both higher overall catalyticactivity and more surprisingly, higher stability for cyclohexenehydrogenation than the Pd/nanotube powders. The granule size for bothcatalysts was between 20 and 40 mesh.

With respect to the high stability, the initial conversion ofcyclohexene was approximately the same for both catalysts. However, asshown in FIGS. 3 and 4, the conversion of cyclohexene in the presence ofthe Pd/nanotube powders decreased measureably over time and did notreach a steady state condition within the 350 minutes allotted for theexperiment. On the other hand, the conversion of cyclohexene in thepresence of Pd/nanotube pellets decreased slightly in comparison, andreached steady state conditions within the allotted time of theexperiment. These results show that a carbon nanotube structure formedfrom nanotubes on which Pd has been predeposited not only retains itsdispersion, but that this is reflected in reaction performance.

Example 4

The process for preparing Pd/nanotube extrudate supported catalysts fromExample 2 was repeated. However, the Pd/nanotube extrudates were groundin two stages. After the initial ground, smaller particles of extrudatewere ignored, and the larger particles of the extrudates wereselectively collected, ground again and sieved to obtain particlesbetween 20 and 40 mesh. It was believed that the larger extrudateparticles originated from the exterior of the extrudate since theexterior part has higher density and strength than the interior of theextrudate. The exterior part of the extrudate would also contain more Pdatoms than the interior part of the extrudate due to the ion exchangemethod used for loading the Pd onto the already formed extrudate.

The catalytic activity of this re-sampled Pd/extrudate catalyst supportwas then examined for cyclohexene hydrogenation under the sameconditions as Example 2. The new results are indicated with opentriangles in FIG. 5, which also includes the results from Example 3 forcomparison.

The re-sampled Pd/extrudate catalysts of this example showed comparablecatalytic activity to the Pd/nanotube powders.

Example 5

Pd/nanotube powders and Pd/nanotube pellets were prepared followingExample 2, except that 0.2 wt % Pd/nanotube catalyst samples wereprepared instead of 0.5 wt % Pd/nanotube catalyst samples as in Example3. The hydrogenation of cyclohexene on the particles crushed from thepellets was carried out and the results are displayed in FIG. 6.

FIG. 6 revealed, unlike the results for Example 3, that the catalyticactivities of the 0.2 wt % Pd/nanotube powders and pellets werecomparable.

Example 6

CC nanotubes were extruded with PAM-3K polymer binder. The extrudateswere then calcined in Ar at 600° C. for 2 hr and functionalized with 35%HNO₃ at 80° C. for 2 hr. The extrudates were not ground prior to loadingPd.

Three loadings of Pd/nanotube extrudate catalysts were prepared. Thesupported catalyst with 0.5 wt % Pd was prepared with Pd(NH₃)₄Cl₂solution by ion exchange at room temperature for 24 hrs.

The supported catalysts with 1.5 wt % and 3 wt % of Pd were prepared byincipient wetness impregnation with PdCl₂/HCl solution at roomtemperature.

Apparent Pd dispersions were measured by CO chemisorption at roomtemperature and the results are displayed in Table 6. The apparent Pddispersion of the 3.0 wt % Pd/nanotube extrudate catalyst was furthercompared to other Pd/nanotube powder catalysts oxidized under differentconditions as reported in Table 7. The samples were reduced at 300° C.for 2 hr prior to the chemisorption. TABLE 6 Apparent Pd dispersion forPd catalysts supported on functionalized CC nanotube extrudates NominalLoading Pd dispersion Pd Particle Catalyst (wt %) (%) size (nm) A 0.517.0 6.6 B 1.5 30.1 3.7 C 3.0 35.1 3.2

TABLE 7 Comparison between the catalysts supported on different nanotubesupports Nominal Pd Oxidation Loading dispersion Pd Particle CatalystSupport conditions (wt %) (%) size (nm) C Extrudate 35% HNO₃/ 3.0 35.13.2 80° C./2 hr D Powder 35% HNO₃/ 3.0 30.9 3.6 80° C./2 hr E Powder 60%HNO₃/ 3.0 44.4 2.5 116° C./4 hr

Example 7

Pd/nanotube extrudates were prepared using the process of Example 6,except that the extrudates were oxidized with ozone instead of HNO₃.Without breaking into small pieces, the whole extrudates were loadedwith Pd by ion exchange in Pd(NH₃)₄(NO₃)₂/H₂O solution at roomtemperature. The nominal loading of Pd was about 0.5 wt %. The apparentPd dispersion measured by CO chemisorption at room temperature was37.4%, which was lower than the 47.9% for the Pd catalyst supported onozone-oxidized CC nanotube powders.

Example 8

Extrudates prepared from CC nanotubes using the same method as Example 2were oxidized with ozone at room temperature. Prior to loading Pd, 0.5 gof ozone treated CC nanotube extrudates were hydrated with 1.0 ml of DIwater and dried at 100° C. under vacuum over night. 3.0 ml ofPdAc₂/acetone solution containing 2.5 mg of Pd was mixed with theextrudates, and the excess acetone was vaporized at room temperature.Some orange color solids were observed on the wall of crucible. About1-2 ml of acetone was added in order to dissolve the solids. When theacetone was vaporized, the amount of solids remaining appear todecrease. Acetone was added and vaporized 3 times until the solidsalmost disappeared.

The Pd/nanotube extrudates were the dried at 60° C. under vacuum for 1hr, then at 100° C. for another hour, and then kept in the oven tillcooled to room temperature. The apparent Pd dispersion, as measured byCO chemisorption at room temperature, was 39.1%, which is lower than57.8% for the Pd/nanotube powders (prepared with ozone as the oxidizingagent) loaded using the same procedure.

Example 9

The effects of heating and evacuation on Pd dispersion and extrudatestrength were examined. Extrudates were made by extrusion of HNO₃oxidized CC nanotube powders. They were calcined in Ar at 240° C. for 2hrs. The acid titer exhibited upon titration was about 0.668 meq/g. 0.5g of HNO₃ oxidized CC nanotube powders and extrudates was loaded in aflask which was well sealed and was connected to a vacuum system. Theflask was evacuated to 100 mTorr, and was heated at 120° C. and 100mTorr for 30 min. When the flask was cooled to room temperature, 5.0 ml(3.0 ml for extrudates) of PdAc₂/acetone solution containing 2.5 mg ofPd was injected into the flask. A number of extrudates fell apart whensolution was added—thus, confirming that heating and evacuation do notnecessarily improve extrudate strength. The excess acetone was removedby evaporation at room temperature. The catalyst was dried at 100° C.under vacuum for 1 hr, then at 40° C. overnight.

For comparison, the comparable catalysts (i.e., samples 3 and 5) wereprepared without the application of heating and evacuation. The apparentPd dispersions were measured using CO chemisorption at room temperatureand are reported in Table 8: TABLE 8 Apparent Pd dispersion for Pdcatalysts supported on concentrated HNO₃ oxidized CC nanotube powders orextrudates Pd Nominal Pd Particle Heating & Loading dispersion sizeCatalyst Support evacuation (wt %) (%) (nm) 3 Extrudate No 0.5 33.4 3.44 Extrudate Yes 0.5 30.4 3.7 5 Powder No 0.5 56.7 2.0 6 Powder Yes 0.557.8 1.9

Table 8 revealed that treatment with heating and evacuation does notnecessarily improve Pd dispersion (i.e., compare samples 3 vs. 4;samples 5 vs. 6).

Example 10

Competitive ion exchange is normally used in introducing andhomogeneously distributing small amounts of precious metal on a supportwith a large surface area. It is more effective when used for loadingmetal catalysts onto cylindrical pellets than onto powders because ithelps to improve mass transfer. In this example, NH₄ ⁺ was chosen as thecompetitive ion for Pd(NH₃)₄ ⁺ in the preparation of 0.5 wt % of Pdcatalyst supported on extrudates.

0.5 g of ozone-oxidized plain CC nanotubes were extruded to formextrudates. The extrudates were added to a flask with 25 ml ofPd(NH₃)₄(NO₃)₂ and NH₄Ac water solution that contains 2.5 g of Pd and61.7 mg of NH₄Ac. The mixture system was stirred with mechanic stirrerat room temperature for 24 hr. After filtered and washed thoroughly withDI water, the catalyst was dried under vacuum at 100° C. for 2 hr.Apparent Pd dispersion was measured using CO chemisorption at roomtemperature and the results are reported in Table 9: TABLE 9 Apparent Pddispersion for Pd catalysts supported on CC nanotube extrudates NominalPd dis- Particle Cata- Loading persion size lyst Oxidation Ions (wt %)(%) (nm) 7 35% HNO₃ Pd(NH₃)₄ ⁺ 0.5 17.0 6.6 8 Ozone Pd(NH₃)₄ ⁺ 0.5 37.43.0 9 Ozone Pd(NH₃)₄ ⁺ & NH₄ ⁺ 0.5 50.3 2.2 10* Ozone Pd(NH₃)₄ ⁺ 0.547.9 2.3*Powders

Example 11

Supported catalyst 11 was prepared by impregnation with 5.0 mlPdAc₂/acetone solution at room temperature. Prior to impregnation, theozone-oxidized CC nanotube powders were hydrated with water and weredried at 100° C. in a vacuum oven for 3 hrs.

Supported catalyst 12 was prepared by following the same procedure assupported catalyst 11 except for two differences: 1) nanotubes were notpre-hydrated; 2) PdAc₂ was dissolved in methanol instead of acetone.

Supported catalyst 13 was prepared by following the same procedure formaking supported catalyst 11, except for two differences: 1) nanotubeswere not pre-hydrated; 2) PdAc₂ was dissolved in acetone/H₂O mixture.The mixture contains 4 ml of PdAc₂/acetone solution and 1 ml of DIwater.

The apparent Pd dispersion was measured by CO chemisorption at roomtemperature and the results are displayed in Table 10: TABLE 10 ApparentPd dispersion for Pd catalysts supported on ozone-oxidized CC nanotubepowders Nominal Pd Loading dispersion Particle Catalyst Solvent (wt %)(%) size (nm) 11* Acetone 0.5 57.8 1.9 12 Methanol 0.5 26.0 4.3 13Acetone/H₂O 0.5 37.6 3.0*pre-hydrated

Table 10 revealed that hydration of ozone-oxidized nanotubes prior toloading Pd can increase Pd dispersion when using acetone as solvent.

Example 12

10 grams of CC-type carbon nanotubes were placed in a 200 cc roundbottom flask and 100 ml of 63% nitric acid was added and the temperaturewas raised to reflux condition for 2 hours. The product was then cooleddown, filtered, and thoroughly washed with deionized water and dried at80° C. Ammonium heptamolybdate with designated loading was then added tothe oxidized carbon nanotubes by incipient wetness impregnation. Thenthe solid content in the metal loaded carbon nanotubes was measured andsubsequently adjusted to 30-40% either by removing or adding extrasolvent before extrusion was performed. The resulting extrudates werethen dried and calcined in air at 250-300° C. Sulfurization of supportedmolybdenum oxides was carried out in a hydrogen/thiophene mixture with(10% thiophene in H₂) at 400 C to make Mo sulphide supported on carbonnanotube structures. The said catalyst was tested to be capable ofcatalyzing hydrodesulphurization of thiopene.

Example 13

A solution of CrCl₃.H₂O (3.15 g) in de-ionized water (50 mL) is preparedin a round-bottomed flask. 25.0 grams of oxidized carbon nanotubes(CC-type) are then added into the above solution and the slurry isstirred on a rotary evaporator at room temperature at ambient pressurefor 2 hours. The water is then removed under vacuum and the solidcontent in the wet cake is controlled to be between 25-40% beforeextrusion. The extrudates is further dried at 130 C in nitrogen for 20hours. The recovered catalyst is weighed 26.65 g and contained about 7.5weight percent CrCl₃. The reaction, florination of CH₂Cl₂, isinvestigated in an nickel alloy reactor. At 275 C and the ratio of HF toCH₂Cl₂ of 4, a 50% selectivity of CH₂F₂ can be reached after 1 hour ofreaction.

Example 14

CC-type of multiwalled carbon nanotubes are first oxidized by 63% nitricacid in a round bottom flask under reflux condition for 4 hours. Afterfiltration and thorough wash with deionized water, the filter cake isfurther dispersed in water under sonication. The solid content of thisnanotubes suspension is kept under 0.05 wt %.

Single walled nanotubes made from a method described in U.S. Pat. No.6,827,919 is first oxidized in nitric acid under the similar fashion asdescribed previously. The resulting nanotubes are free of metalcatalysts, and in the form of smaller and shorter bundles as compared tothe as-made material. After filtration and thorough washed withdeionized water and acetone sequentially, the product is dried carefullyunder vacuum at room temperature. The dried single-walled nanotubes arefurther treated with ozone using a method disclosed in a US ProvisionalApplication No. 60/621,132, filed Oct. 22, 2004, where functional groupssuch as carboxyls, hydroxyls, carbonyls, and lactones are moreeffectively produced on the surface of nanotubes. An 8-hour reflux withK₂PtCl₄ in dilute ethylene glycol (3:2 by volume of ethylene glycol:DIH₂O) at 120°-130° C. then deposits Pt particles onto the single-wallednanotubes processed previously. Approximately 1.5 mg of K₂PtCl₄ and 20ml of diluted ethylene glycol are added per 10 mg of single-wallednanotubes. The product (Pt-loaded SWNT bundles) is cooled, centrifuged,washed with DI water made slightly acidic with a few drops of HCl (anonoxidizing acid to destabilize the suspension). Typical metal loadingof the final material is 10 wt % Pt. Deionized water is then added toPt-loaded single-walled nanotubes to form a uniform suspension and mixedwith multiwalled nanotubes suspension made previously under sonication.Finally, the resulting suspension is concentrated using a rotaryevaporator, filtered, dried carefully to achieve a solid content of20-40% and the extruded to form ⅛ inch cylindrical exudates. Finally,these exudates are calcinated in argon at 500° C. to form a rigid porousstructure via cross-linking. The product is composed of small bundles ofsingle-walled nanotubes loaded with 102 nm Pt particles locked inside arigid porous structured multiwalled nanotubes.

The terms and expressions which have been employed are used as terms ofdescription and not of limitations, and there is no intention in the useof such terms or expressions of excluding any equivalents of thefeatures shown and described as portions thereof, it being recognizedthat various modifications are possible within the scope of theinvention.

Thus, while there had been described what are presently believed to bethe preferred embodiments of the present invention, those skilled in theart will appreciate that other and further modifications can be madewithout departing from the true scope of the invention, and it isintended to include all such modifications and changes as come withinthe scope of the claims.

1. A method for preparing a supported catalyst comprising the steps of:loading metal catalysts or metal catalyst precursors, onto carbonnanotubes and forming a carbon nanotube structure from said metal loadedcarbon nanotubes.
 2. A method for preparing a supported catalystcomprising the steps of: functionalizing carbon nanotubes with afunctionalizing agent to form functionalized carbon nanotubes, loadingmetal catalysts, or metal catalyst precursors onto said functionalizedcarbon nanotubes to form metal loaded carbon nanotubes.
 3. A method forpreparing a supported catalyst comprising the step of: functionalizingcarbon nanotubes with a functionalizing agent to form functionalizedcarbon nanotubes, loading metal catalyst, or metal catalyst precursorsonto said functionalized carbon nanotubes to form metal loaded carbonnanotubes, said metal catalysts selected from the group consisting ofruthenium, osmium, rhodium, iridium, palladium, platinum, silver, goldor a mixture thereof, and forming a carbon nanotubes structure from saidmetal loaded carbon nanotubes.
 4. A method for preparing a supportedcatalyst comprising the steps of: functionalizing carbon nanotubes withan oxidizing agent to form functionalized carbon nanotubes, loadingmetal catalysts onto said functionalized carbon nanotubes to form metalloaded carbon nanotubes, said metal catalysts selected from the groupconsisting of ruthenium, osmium, rhodium, iridium, palladium, platinum,silver, gold or a mixture thereof, and forming a carbon nanotubestructure from said metal loaded carbon nanotubes.
 5. The method ofclaim 4, wherein said oxidizing agent is selected from the groupconsisting of potassium chlorate, sulfuric acid, nitric acid (HNO₃),persulfate, hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), CO₂, O₂, steam, N₂O, NO, NO₂, O₃,or ClO₂.
 6. The method of claim 4, where said carbon nanotube structureis a rigid porous structure formed by extruding said metal loaded carbonnanotubes.
 7. The method of claim 6, further comprising calcining saidmetal loaded rigid porous structure.
 8. The method of claim 4, whereinsaid carbon nanotube structure is a rigid porous structure formed byextruding said metal loaded carbon nanotubes with gluing agents orbinders selected from the group consisting of cellulose-based polymers,hydroxyl ethyl cellulose, carboxyl methyl cellulose, cellulose,carbohydrates, polyethylene, polystyrene, nylon, polyurethane,polyester, polyamides, poly(dimethylsiloxane), acrylic polymers andphenolic resins.
 9. The method of claim 4, wherein said metal catalystsare loaded onto said functionalized carbon nanotubes by mixing asolution containing salts of said metal catalysts with saidfunctionalized carbon nanotubes and evaporating said solution.
 10. Themethod of claim 4, wherein said metal catalysts are loaded onto saidfunctionalized carbon nanotubes by impregnation, incipient wetness, ionexchange, precipitation, physical or chemical adsorption orco-precipitation.
 11. A method for preparing a supported catalystcomprising the steps of: functionalizing carbon nanotubes with anoxidizing agent to form functionalized carbon nanotubes, loading metalcatalysts onto said functionalized carbon nanotubes to form metal loadedcarbon nanotubes, said metal catalysts selected from the groupconsisting of oxides, halides, carbides, nitrides, phosphides andsulfides of Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Y, Zr, Nb, Mo, La, Ce, Wor combinations thereof, and forming a carbon nanotube structure fromsaid metal loaded carbon nanotubes.
 12. A method according to claims 1or 11 where tubes are multi-wall carbon nanotubes.
 13. A methodaccording to claims 1 or 11 where tubes are single wall carbonnanotubes.
 14. A method according to claims 1 or 11 where the carbonnanotubes are a mixture of multi-wall and single wall nanotubes.